A pro-life campaigner is set to take her case to the European Court of Human Rights after being prohibited from providing women with support outside an abortion clinic.
Alina Dulgheriu argues that the Public Space Protection Order instituted by Ealing Council outside a Marie Stopes clinic – which criminalises speech, assembly, charitable support and prayer, including silent prayer – violates her most fundamental rights.
In August 2019, a Court of Appeal found that Alina’s rights to assembly, religion, thought, expression and reception of information were impeded by the council’s order. Despite this, the Court of Appeal went on to qualify that such violations were justified because of the right of Marie Stopes attendees not to be seen in public space near the facility.
When Dulgheriu applied to have her case heard in the Supreme Court, she was summarily rejected. The European Court of Human Rights represents her final mode of appeal, and is only possible due to hundreds of generous supporters. So far, some £70,000 has been raised to fund her legal battle. The ECHR currently has jurisdiction over roughly 800 million citizens across Europe, including the UK.
Dulgheriu said: “My little girl is here today because of the real practical and emotional support that I was given by a group outside a Marie Stopes centre, and I am going to appeal this decision to ensure that women do not have this vital support option removed.
“I will continue to stand up for the women whose voices have been sidelined throughout this process and for women who need life-saving support today but cannot get it.
“Ealing Council could have taken action in a way that would have protected women and safeguarded the essential help offered at the gate. Instead, they criminalised charity and attempted to remove dedicated and caring individuals from public space without justification.
“It is very clear that many are opposed to Ealing’s ban on peaceful and charitable activity, and like me, they want to see support available to vulnerable women where it is most needed.
“I cannot imagine a society where a simple offer of help to a woman who might want to keep her child is seen as a criminal offence. I refuse to accept that women should be denied the opportunity to receive help where they want to keep their child.”
Dulgheriu is working with a group called “Be Here For Me,” which has billed itself as representing “mothers against the ban on help outside abortion clinics.”
“Eight years ago, Alina Dulgheriu found herself jobless, homeless and alone after an unplanned pregnancy. She’d been fired from her job as a live-in nanny and abandoned by her boyfriend.
“She went to Marie Stopes to get advice on her options, but all they could offer her was an abortion. She didn’t want that but didn’t know where to turn.
“Her life was changed when she met a pro-life volunteer at the gates of the abortion centre who told her that she did have options, that there was help available, and that she could keep her baby if she wanted.
“She accepted the offer of help and her daughter Sarah was born. She is now seven years old, a beautiful, lively and beloved child.
“Ealing Council has banned pro-lifers from helping women in similar situations. Alina has challenged their decision in court, but three times the courts have ignored her story. In five years of the pro-life vigil’s work in Ealing, more than 500 women accepted an offer of help and chose to keep their baby rather than have an abortion. These women have tried again and again to have their voices heard, but they are ignored.”
Sources: Christian News
U.S. Supreme Court Rules Against New York’s Restrictions On Religious Gatherings
The U.S. Supreme Court has temporarily barred New York from enforcing strict attendance limits on places of worship in areas designated coronavirus hot spots, in a decision released just before midnight on Wednesday.
The decision marked a major shift for the court, in essence at least a partial reversal of previous rulings, as well as a clear indication of the court’s dramatic move to the right with the addition of new Justice Amy Coney Barrett in place of the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Earlier this year, while Ginsburg was still on the court, it was Chief Justice John Roberts who cast the critical fifth vote to uphold a similar order from governors in California and Nevada.
This time, Roberts was in the minority, noting that the New York rules at issue in the case had already been eased.
The newly constituted majority, however, rejected Roberts’ deferential approach, noting that New York could impose the strict orders again at any time.
“The restrictions at issue here, by effectively barring many from attending religious services, strike at the very heart of the First Amendment’s guarantee of religious liberty,” the unsigned majority decision said. “Even in a pandemic, the constitution cannot be put away and forgotten.”
The New York rules imposed by Governor Andrew Cuomo restricted attendance at religious services in areas classified as “red” or “orange” zones. In red zones, no more than 10 people were permitted to attend each service, and in orange zones, attendance was capped at 25.
Those rules, which the court majority found to be “severe” and “inflexible,” did not apply to retail stores in the same neighborhoods, the decision said. In an “orange” zone, where secular businesses are subject to no attendance cap at all, the discrimination was “even starker,” the court said.
The justices in the majority, in addition to Barrett, were Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch.
Gorsuch filed an unusually acerbic concurring opinion, blasting not only Governor Cuomo but also Chief Justice Roberts for his earlier opinion in the California and Nevada cases.
Referring to the more lax rules for New York retailers, Gorsuch opined that “at least according to Governor Cuomo, it may be unsafe to go to church, but it is always fine to pick up another bottle of wine, shop for a new bike, or spend the afternoon exploring your distal points and meridians,” a reference to acupuncture being unregulated.
And when it came to Roberts, Gorsuch spent several pages accusing him of “rewriting history” in his dissenting opinion on Wednesday and his earlier opinions in the California and Nevada cases.
“In the end,” said Gorsuch, while Roberts and the other dissenters may wish to “stay out of the way” and let state officials and experts deal with the crisis of a pandemic, “we may not shelter in place where the Constitution is under attack.” There is, he wrote, “no world in which the Constitution tolerates color-coded executive edicts that reopen liquor stores and bike shops but shutter churches, synagogues, and mosques.”
Roberts replied with a slap-down of his own. Quoting from Gorsuch’s acid dismissal of the dissenters’ views, the Chief Justice said he did not regard his dissenting colleagues with such venom: “They simply view the matter differently after careful study and reflecting their best efforts to fulfill their responsibility under the Constitution.”
As to Gorsuch’s concurrence, which, as Roberts put it, “takes aim at my [earlier] concurring opinion,” Gorsuch had engaged in such overkill that he spent “three pages” criticizing one sentence.
And “what did that sentence say?” asked Roberts. “Only that our Constitution principally entrusts the safety and health of the people to the politically accountable officials of the states to guard and protect.”
Those words, said Roberts, “should be uncontroversial, and the Gorsuch concurrence must reach beyond the words themselves to find the target it is looking for.”
That earlier opinion involved rules that were not as strict as the New York rules. The California church limited attendance to 100 people. In buildings with a capacity of 400 or fewer people, capacity was limited to 25%. In Nevada, churches were limited to 50 people.
On Nov. 12, the Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn and Agudath Israel of America asked the court for temporary injunctions against the New York governor’s executive order.
The synagogues said Cuomo’s order “singled out a particular religion for blame and retribution” for the uptick in coronavirus cases.
The court granted the temporary injunctive relief until the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in December — and then the Supreme Court as appropriate — can more fully consider the merits of the case. But the majority said that challengers, as of now, have a good chance of prevailing if they get to the Supreme Court again.
It’s unclear how the case will proceed. New York’s Solicitor General Barbara D. Underwood recently informed the court that recent changes to the policies in question meant none of the diocese’s churches or the area’s synagogues would any longer be subject to the restrictions.
Cuomo described Wednesday’s decision as a political statement. In his daily coronavirus briefing Thursday, he said, “Look, I’m a former altar boy, Catholic, Catholic grammar school, Catholic high school, Jesuits at college. So I fully respect religion and if there’s a time in life when we need it, the time is now. But we want to make sure we keep people safe at the same time, and that’s the balance we’re trying to hit, especially in this holiday season.”
Indonesian Terrorist Burns Down Church and Christian Homes, Killing Four
International Christian Concern (ICC) has learned that on November 27, an alleged terrorist attacked the Salvation Army’s service post in central Sulawesi, before burning six houses of church members. Four Christians were murdered, with three being butchered.
Around 8 a.m., the Lewonu Lembantongoa Service Post, located in Sigi Regency, Central Sulawesi, set up as an outreach effort by the Salvation Army in Indonesia (Bala Keselamatan), was attacked by the alleged terrorist.
He set the church on fire, before attacking Captain Arnianto, Mrs. Mpapa, Lieutenant Abram Kako and his wife and burning down six houses of the church members. Out of the four victims, three were hacked to death, while the other was burned.
In the video seen by ICC, the charred victim was pulled from a pile of ruins, with smoke still rising in the background. The fowler position of the body suggests the agony and pain endured by the victim before death.
Lemban Tongoa is located in the forest, where access of information and transportation is limited. ICC will continue to follow up to learn more about the details of the attack. The Salvation Army is asking for prayers “for the family of the victims, for the church, and for the peace of the region.”
Gina Goh, ICC’s Regional Manager for Southeast Asia, said, “ICC mourns the death of the Indonesian brothers and sisters who were brutally murdered by the alleged terrorist. We urge the Indonesian government to take necessary measures to hold him accountable and put him to justice. Such senseless act cannot be tolerated in the country that boasts ‘Pancasila,’ the state ideology which promotes religious harmony and tolerance.”
U.S. Supreme Court Rules Against New York’s Restrictions On Religious Gatherings
The U.S. Supreme Court has temporarily barred New York from enforcing strict attendance limits on places of worship in areas...
കർത്യമേശ പാത്രം വാങ്ങിയോ? ഈ വീഡിയോ കാണുക
കെ.എസ്.ആർ.ടി.സി എ.സി ലോ ഫ്ലോർ ബസുകളിലും നിരക്കിളവ് ഡിസംബർ ഒന്നു മുതൽ
തിരുവനന്തപുരം: കെ.എസ്.ആർ.ടി.സിയുടെ സൂപ്പർ ഫാസ്റ്റ് മുതലുള്ള ബസുകൾക്ക് നൽകിയിരുന്ന 25 ശതമാനം നിരക്കിളവ് എ.സി ലോ ഫ്ലോർ ബസുകൾക്കുകൂടി അനുവദിച്ചു. ചൊവ്വ, ബുധൻ, വ്യാഴം ദിവസങ്ങളിലാണ് ഇളവനുവദിച്ചിരിക്കുന്നതെന്ന്...
ഉത്തർപ്രദേശിൽ നിർബന്ധിത മതപരിവർത്തന ബില്ല് ഓർഡിനൻസായി നിലവിൽ വന്നു
ഉത്തർപ്രദേശിൽ നിർബന്ധിത മതപരിവർത്തന ബില്ല് ഓർഡിനൻസായി നിലവിൽ വന്നു. രാവിലെ ഗവർണർ ബില്ല് ഒർഡിനൻസായി വിജ്ഞാപനം ചെയ്യുകയായിരുന്നു. ഏതൊരു വ്യക്തിയ്ക്ക് മതപരിവർത്തനം നടത്തണമെങ്കിലും മുൻ കൂട്ടി സർക്കാരിനെ...
ഗ്യാസ് സിലിണ്ടര് ബുക്ക് ചെയ്യുന്നവര്ക്ക് പണം ഇങ്ങോട്ട് ലഭിക്കുന്നു, ചെയ്യേണ്ടത് ഇങ്ങനെ
എൽപിജി സിലിണ്ടറിന്റെ പേയ്മെന്റ് ആമസോണിലൂടെ നടത്തിയാൽ കാഷ്ബാക്ക് ഓഫർ. സിലിണ്ടർ ബുക്ക് ചെയ്ത് പണമടയ്ക്കുമ്പോൾ ആമസോൺ 50 രൂപ അധിക ക്യാഷ്ബാക്ക് ഓഫറാണ് വാഗ്ദാനം ചെയ്യുന്നത്. വിപണന...
വാഹനത്തിന്റെ ആർസി ബുക്കിൽ നോമിനിയേയും ചേർക്കാം.
ന്യൂഡൽഹി∙ വാഹനം റജിസ്റ്റർ ചെയ്യുമ്പോൾ ഉടമയുടെ പേരിനൊപ്പം ആർസിയിൽ നോമിനിയെയും നിർദേശിക്കാവുന്നവിധം മോട്ടർ വാഹന നിയമത്തിൽ ഭേദഗതി വരത്തുന്നു. ഉടമയ്ക്ക് എന്തെങ്കിലും സംഭവിച്ചാൽ വാഹനം നോമിനിയുടെ...